John Vella
26-06-2003, 09:07 AM
This is a style question with regards to changing over the bass from the track you are playing to the new one comming in.
I'm sure many DJs do a bit of both depending on the tunes and style of music, but generally speaking which of the following to you employ MOST OF THE TIME:
1) Do you like to 'declare' the new track is 'taking over' (becoming the dominant track) with a more sudden change of bass? (with the new tracks bass comming in at the appropriate beat/measure almost screaming "OK GUYS!!! BANG!!! HERE's THE NEW TRACK TAKING OVER NOW!!!!")
OR
2) Do you prefer a very slow gradual blend of both bassess? One where it happens so methodically and smoothly, that there is NOT a more aggresive "declaration" of the new tune being made... The new tune has snuck in like an expert ninja theif in the night, slowly taking away from the current tune, while gradually blending in the bass of the new one (also obviously being done at proper times--so there are no off-timed shifts in bass--albiet in this case they are VERY gradual ones and certainly not noticed by the casual raver or club-goer)
KEEP IN MIND.... When I mention method 1, the mix is still smooth and layered for a while... perhaps just as long as method 2.... I'm strictly talking bass here...
ALSO, for lovers of Method 2, How do u compensate for this lack of aural drama? Do u do something to give the mix a more exciting sense of "closure" via Special Effects or whatever? Or do u feel there's no need to compensate for anything?
VERY CURIOUS!!!! :)
IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT, PLEASE LET ME KNOW SO I CAN TRY TO RE-WORD IT....
I am really anxious to know people's views on this....
-jOHNNY
I'm sure many DJs do a bit of both depending on the tunes and style of music, but generally speaking which of the following to you employ MOST OF THE TIME:
1) Do you like to 'declare' the new track is 'taking over' (becoming the dominant track) with a more sudden change of bass? (with the new tracks bass comming in at the appropriate beat/measure almost screaming "OK GUYS!!! BANG!!! HERE's THE NEW TRACK TAKING OVER NOW!!!!")
OR
2) Do you prefer a very slow gradual blend of both bassess? One where it happens so methodically and smoothly, that there is NOT a more aggresive "declaration" of the new tune being made... The new tune has snuck in like an expert ninja theif in the night, slowly taking away from the current tune, while gradually blending in the bass of the new one (also obviously being done at proper times--so there are no off-timed shifts in bass--albiet in this case they are VERY gradual ones and certainly not noticed by the casual raver or club-goer)
KEEP IN MIND.... When I mention method 1, the mix is still smooth and layered for a while... perhaps just as long as method 2.... I'm strictly talking bass here...
ALSO, for lovers of Method 2, How do u compensate for this lack of aural drama? Do u do something to give the mix a more exciting sense of "closure" via Special Effects or whatever? Or do u feel there's no need to compensate for anything?
VERY CURIOUS!!!! :)
IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT, PLEASE LET ME KNOW SO I CAN TRY TO RE-WORD IT....
I am really anxious to know people's views on this....
-jOHNNY