Wow - that makes it sound really, really snotty.Originally Posted by Jay Pace
Wow - that makes it sound really, really snotty.Originally Posted by Jay Pace
how so?Originally Posted by dodgyedgy
my mates wer at cocoon this year when sven vath didnt turn up and said james holden managed to make the whole night more minimal than prog which he normally plays. good on himOriginally Posted by Jay Sanders
hes another one on the minimal bandwagon,hardly plays prog no more so it seems. to be fair though from listening to some old progressive house cds the other week there isnt really a huge difference between the 2 genres.Originally Posted by doc12inch
\"if you don\'t explode a few heads every night, then you\'re not doing your job\" R.Hawtin IDJ 2001
Yeah ive heard alot of good things about Jame sHolden recently... his productions kick ass!!!
Rowlanz - Faith, Trust & Love
Rowlanz & McGowan - Winging It
De Novo (Digital)
OUT NOW
Remix of "The Sky Was Pink" by Nathan Fake is outstanding.Originally Posted by Jay Sanders
It just stinks of the Elitism and self congratulatory bollocks and you can only do this if you are the best, nonsense that rears its ugly head sometimes. I just happen to believe that music can be written by anyone with a passion , rather than what the essay (essay...!) says - you have to know what you are doing?Originally Posted by Jay Pace
I understand what the essay writer is talking about, minimalism in art is an interesting concept. But when those who comment on the scene, like the essay writer is doing, try to place boundaries on who can and cant do it, depending upon percieved ability.
Im probably going a little overboard, but it gets my goat. Its the whole "Ubercoolische" philosophy that really makes me want to vomit.
Easy badger, that's not quite what I was getting at.Originally Posted by dodgyedgy
Any form of art can be analysed, and techno is no different.
What they were talking about was that techno has a rawness, simplicity and beauty that can be paralleled with abstract art.
I'm not into being wanky for the sake of being wanky, but I really like reading what people were trying to do when they make minimal music.
Same as knowing the ideas behind paintings by Mondrian or Kandinsky make them that much more interesting.
Just as you can reduce abstract art to "just a bunch of squares and random blobs" you can reduce minimal techno to just a bunch of bleeps.
You could level the same criticism that "my five year old could do better" at a lot of minimal stuff.
Its not elitism, I just think that especially with minimal there is a lot going on beneath the surface that isn't that obvious. Its not virtuoso performance screaming "look how clever I am" with every over produced second of it, the talent lies behind it. It's much more subtle.
Sorry, I couldn't think of any other way of saying this, and am aware that this probably sounds really poncy. Incidentally the essay was on the inside of a CD cover. Can't remember which one, but it was a brief 4 page inlay on techno's history, and it stuck in my mind because I liked the parallel.
I'll get me coat.
I think what you're trying to say is that in order to do minimalism well, you need to know what you can take away without losing the essence of a piece.
Or to emphasise the essence.
Indeed.Originally Posted by schlongfingers
I do think that better producers can do more with less, and that's the trick... but I think some people can just naturally do more with less, and that's equally as valid as arriving there through a convoluted route taking in very big complex sounds.
Alex Smoke, nuff said.
yeah really love alex smoke's stuff :clap:
TechMouse - Yeah that remix of 'The Sky was pink' is a cracker....
I used to buy and hear alot of James Holdens stuff when he was producing Prog House... Like Frank said.. it isnt that far from minimal really!!
Rowlanz - Faith, Trust & Love
Rowlanz & McGowan - Winging It
De Novo (Digital)
OUT NOW
The other thing with it becoming increasingly popular is that fact thats every magazine and club has jumped in and said... "Oh Yeah we Love Minimal"
Mixmag and IDJ this month both have Massive Ritchie Hawtin interviews in them... not knocking this but it just goes to show how much coverage it must be getting.... Even a minmial CD on Mixmag cover.... i bet theres a lot of people out there that usually love the Lisa Lashes cds or whatever scrathing their heads.
Rowlanz - Faith, Trust & Love
Rowlanz & McGowan - Winging It
De Novo (Digital)
OUT NOW
Magda, make the tea...
Thats part of what i was getting at. The positivity is nothing to dis' fo sho' and i certainly give artists the props they deserve.Originally Posted by Jay Sanders
I Like a lot of minimal, how can i not - some of it is superb. Millsian minimalism - beast! Hawtin minimalism - not very beast in my book..(IMO of course)
I just wanna say that i suspect HIGHLY anything that has the potential to call itself high art, and minimalistic techno has this potential. I'm kinda down to earth about these things, and i love complex sounds. However It kinda begs the question "Can you have highly complex minimalism that dodgyedgy wont feel annoyed with?"
Probably...
my mate used to be into happy hardcore - now hes into minimal stuff - one extreme to anotherOriginally Posted by Frank Dogshit
i really like a bit of minimal,as some of you have probably seen as i post a few sets in the files sections now an again.its just summit diffrent,good for chillin out to.its an absloute pleasure to mix aswell,really fun.
Gabber has that pedestal.Originally Posted by dodgyedgy
Minimal could only compete if it was sped up to 220bpm.
;)
I love minimal for getting the same effect out of a crowd with less. That takes talent.
Proper minimal should be able to rock a crowd and get it grooving in just the same way that hard or funky techno can.
Poncy parallels can be drawn if you like that sort of thing. Keeps us blethering types happy anyway...