I took the idea for this topic from a previous post from tony/crime. toni is a distributor, crime is an artist:
take a step back and look at each other's perspective for a sec. toni - you're so right. music must be marketed and sold and therefore the need for genres and pigeonholes are essential. crime. from an artistic perpective genre's and pigeonholes are what makes you into a marketable product and you don't want this. ultimately it distances you from your beliefs in techno or new/innovative music.
you know, it's a tough call for all artists who believe in pushing boundaries to face up to the fact that their music needs to be marketed. marketing definitely takes away creativity in my eyes (although the making money aspect of it can actually add to it if you can afford some better equipment). This worries me like nothing else. It's like a constant battle in your head as an artist as to what you should/shouldn't be doing.
But also look at the distributors point of view. They can't market your product unless you bang the tracks out and market yourself in a sellable way. You need an image. You need a 'brand'. ie totally what techno is not about.
Perhaps this is the vicious circle that it proving to be a big problem with techno at the mo?
A problem for the artists. A problem with the distributors.
And perhaps why so many distributors are going down....
And perhaps why those who truly know the business side of things properly (eg Radio 1 etc etc) will take techno to a previously unknown level as a marketable brand and take away the creativity of the genre.
Your thoughts please....
I'm sure there will be many!!!!!