Well i never said ban him for life, but he should be banned for longer than 3 or 4 games a red gets you.
End of the day mate, no one can be sure except him whether there was any intent in it. As you stated it was high and it was late, a player with his future infront of him possibly may have his career and his whole life turned upside down.
Do you not think the punishment should be harsher to reflect the damage done by him. "flying in, high and late" resulting in eduardos injury...
Or do you think the 3 - 5 game match ban is sufficient punishment for giving eduardo compound fractures of tibula, fibula and shin...
Surely these injuries reflect the force of him flying in, high and late... They dont happen often which opens my eyes to how bad challange this was...
Eduardos out for @ least a year, possibly forever id suggest a minimum of a 6 month ban to reflect the damage he has done. After all its the minimum a court would be able to hand down such did a incident take place like this off the field, and also as a benchmark.
As others have said in earlier posts, theres been worse challanges, maybe so, but just because no one was injured doesnt make it ok. A benchmark an example may stop the lunges, late, high tackles or @ least look like the PL are doing something about the amount of bad challenges every weekend.
You say about football not being a contact sport, yes your right it should remain contact, but when you see a players foot being held in place by the sock around it, do you just let that go and say well its a contact sport "s8it happens" or do you address the problem in the hope it may not happen again.